{"id":4623,"date":"2025-09-23T13:19:48","date_gmt":"2025-09-23T13:19:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/alert-about-the-upcoming-reform-of-the-criminal-code-our-open-letter-published-this-thursday-june-24-2021\/"},"modified":"2025-09-23T13:19:48","modified_gmt":"2025-09-23T13:19:48","slug":"alert-about-the-upcoming-reform-of-the-criminal-code-our-open-letter-published-this-thursday-june-24-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/alert-about-the-upcoming-reform-of-the-criminal-code-our-open-letter-published-this-thursday-june-24-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"ALERT ABOUT THE UPCOMING REFORM OF THE CRIMINAL CODE: our open letter published this Thursday, June 24, 2021."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Facilitating the prostitution of minors, treating prostitution as a public interest mission, affiliating pimps with the FEB\u2026 In short, that\u2019s what the reform of criminal offenses in \u201csexual\u201d matters would allow. And it\u2019s unacceptable!!! <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">By Charles-Eric Clesse, Anne-Sophie Charle, Sophie Jekeler, board members of the Samilia Foundation; and Sandrine Cnapelinckx, director of the Samilia Foundation.<\/p>\n<p>An open letter published on:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lalibre.be\/debats\/opinions\/2021\/06\/23\/reformer-le-code-penal-pour-faciliter-le-proxenetisme-3OK5NR7RCVERDNYD5VF3MVLVKU\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">La Libre<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lesoir.be\/379808\/article\/2021-06-22\/carte-blanche-reduira-t-neant-30-ans-de-lutte-contre-la-traite-des-etres-humains?fbclid=IwAR2dNK-yYgsj6fpIqd8d529MvzqdCFB5cXSR-4UESqwpDAN5S2drZtWDjeI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Le Soir<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The reform of criminal offenses in \u201csexual\u201d matters, pushed through at full speed and in utmost secrecy by the Minister of Justice, is about to be approved by the De Croo government. The text raises alarming questions regarding the fight against human trafficking and the protection of minors. Grassroots organizations have not been consulted. The wording of the text is indecipherable to anyone who is not a legal expert. It also incorporates concepts from the draft of the new Criminal Code, which has not yet been passed. Far-reaching changes are dramatically weakening Belgium\u2019s legal framework for combating human trafficking. The main legal tools available to magistrates to protect victims and prosecute perpetrators of human trafficking are being abolished:      <\/p>\n<p>\u2013 Pimping is decriminalized in favor of a new concept of \u201cabnormal\u201d exploitation of prostitution;<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 The prostitution of minors aged 16 to 18 is permitted if it cannot be proven that the pimps or clients knew the person was underage;<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 Advertising sexual services online is legalized;<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 The closure of establishments where sexual trafficking occurs will no longer be possible.<\/p>\n<h2>Decriminalization of pimping<\/h2>\n<p>Articles 380 to 382 of the Criminal Code are replaced by a single offense\u2014deriving an \u201cabnormal\u201d advantage from sexual exploitation\u2014reducing all harm to mere economic injury.<\/p>\n<p>The pimp is thus turned into a respectable business owner.<\/p>\n<p>No prosecution can take place if the profit is deemed \u201cnormal.\u201d Dodo la Saumure, who unsuccessfully argued this point in court, must be rubbing his hands with glee. <\/p>\n<p>To make matters worse, determining the threshold of what constitutes an \u201cabnormal\u201d profit will be extremely difficult. Since 1995, a similar provision has already weakened laws on real estate-related pimping to allow sex workers to operate in safe premises: renting property for this purpose is legal unless the landlord makes an \u201cabnormal\u201d profit. In practice, this benefits exploitative landlords: without an objective standard, courts are powerless to judge what constitutes an excessive rent. A rent that appears \u201cnormal\u201d is often topped up by a key money payment or under-the-table surcharge that victims are too afraid to report, for fear of losing their spot in the \u201cvisible\u201d prostitution zones where municipalities impose quotas on display windows.   <\/p>\n<p>The consequences of abolishing the offense of pimping for the fight against human trafficking will be incalculable. Investigations into trafficking are long and complex; victims are often moved to prevent their rescue and fear violent reprisals. Trafficking networks use a \u201cwin-win\u201d strategy, allowing victims to keep a small share of their earnings to discourage them from pressing charges. To prove trafficking without victim testimony, investigators rely on related offenses such as pimping or money laundering. Without those legal tools, the number of sexual trafficking cases will plummet, ensuring impunity for perpetrators and stripping victims of their rights.    <\/p>\n<h2>Facilitation of child prostitution<\/h2>\n<p>According to the International Convention on the Rights of the Child, a \u201cchild\u201d is any person under 18 years of age.<\/p>\n<p>The prostitution of minors is equated with trafficking, whether or not the perpetrator used coercion or deception.<\/p>\n<p>The reform introduces a substantial change (1) requiring that the offense be committed knowingly and intentionally against a minor aged 16 to 18. This facilitates the prostitution of adolescents by shifting the burden of proof: the child or the public prosecutor will have to prove that the pimp or the client knew the victim\u2019s age and intended to commit the offense. In other words: an impossible task.  <\/p>\n<h2>Advertising sexual services on the Internet or social media<\/h2>\n<p>Article 380ter of the Criminal Code, which prohibits any form of advertising related to sexual services on the Internet \u2014 even when disguised by euphemisms \u2014 is repealed. Advertising by sites such as Richmeetbeautiful, condemned for its campaign on the ULB campus, will be freely permitted. Advertising sexual services involving minors remains prohibited, but only if the offense was committed knowingly and intentionally.  <\/p>\n<h2>Closure of establishments and prostitution elevated to a public service mission<\/h2>\n<p>A new Article 433quater\/4 authorizes the closure of establishments only in cases of \u201cabnormal advantage,\u201d except for establishments carrying out a public service mission. Does this imply that prostitution in Eros centers operated by municipal entities could be considered a public service mission? <\/p>\n<h2>What are the objectives?<\/h2>\n<p>The rights of adult sex workers who engage in prostitution voluntarily are already protected: prostitution is not a criminal offense; one may operate one\u2019s own salon; and self-employed status is available.<\/p>\n<p>Case law even upholds the rights of a sex worker under an employment contract, obliging the pimp to pay social security contributions despite the contract\u2019s nullity.<\/p>\n<p>So why repeal the articles on pimping \u2014 the very foundation of protection for the most vulnerable, namely victims of human trafficking?<\/p>\n<p>The governing coalition agreement does not call for the decriminalization of pimping. By adopting this reform, our elected officials would take responsibility for denouncing international conventions ratified by Belgium, including the International Convention on the Rights of the Child. <\/p>\n<p>Our current legislation has served as a model for the European Directive on combating human trafficking.<\/p>\n<p>Soon, we risk finding ourselves among the \u201cbad pupils\u201d of the European Union and the Council of Europe, which may remind Belgium of its obligations in the fight against trafficking.<\/p>\n<p><small>(1) Statement of reasons for the preliminary draft bill, p. 91.<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facilitating the prostitution of minors, treating prostitution as a public interest mission, affiliating pimps with the FEB\u2026 In short, that\u2019s what the reform of criminal offenses in \u201csexual\u201d matters would [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3914,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4623\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samilia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}